Skip to content

(IDAS-422) CBOS upgrade to node v22#3098

Merged
ypk merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/IDAS-422-Node-22-Upgrade
Apr 13, 2026
Merged

(IDAS-422) CBOS upgrade to node v22#3098
ypk merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/IDAS-422-Node-22-Upgrade

Conversation

@ypk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ypk ypk commented Mar 24, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Describe your changes

This upgrades node to v22

  • Updated .nvmrc from 20 to 22.22.0
  • Updated package.json engines fields to >=22.0.0 <23.0.0
  • Updated Docker base images to node:22-alpine3.22
  • Updated Azure Pipeline files nodeVersion from 20
  • Updated Turbo 2.x config by moving NODE_ENV and APP_RELEASE to env field and removed --parallel flags
  • Updated README.md to reflect Node 22 as current version
  • Updated types and broken tests

Issue ticket number and link

IDAS-422 [CBOS] Update Node to v22

Type of change 🧩

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update
  • Other (please explain in the description section above)

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have double checked this work does not include any hardcoded secrets or passwords
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have provided details on how I have tested my code
  • I have referenced the ticket number above
  • I have provided a description of the ticket
  • I have included unit tests to cover any testable code changes

@ypk ypk requested a review from a team as a code owner March 24, 2026 13:24
@ypk ypk changed the title chore(deps): upgrade cbos to node v22 (idas-422) (IDAS-422) CBOS upgrade to node v22 Mar 24, 2026
@ypk ypk force-pushed the feat/IDAS-422-Node-22-Upgrade branch from da1c7f0 to 16b1aca Compare March 24, 2026 13:27
emil-placheta
emil-placheta requested changes Mar 25, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread ...lications/case/documentation/__tests__/__snapshots__/applications-documentation.test.js.snap Outdated
Comment thread README.md Outdated
Comment thread apps/e2e/cypress/page_objects/createCaseSections/geographicalInformation.js Outdated
Snasim21
Snasim21 previously approved these changes Mar 25, 2026
View reviewed changes
@ypk ypk force-pushed the feat/IDAS-422-Node-22-Upgrade branch from 39ccf42 to 08d3b2f Compare April 9, 2026 11:33
@ypk ypk requested a review from emil-placheta April 9, 2026 14:16
@ypk ypk force-pushed the feat/IDAS-422-Node-22-Upgrade branch 2 times, most recently from e6ee3fd to 4ba22fa Compare April 9, 2026 15:23
@ypk
chore(deps): upgrade to Node.js v22 (IDAS-422)
9ff153e 
- Updated .nvmrc and all package.json files for Node v22
- Refreshed dependency lockfiles and Docker configurations
- Updated Azure pipelines and build tool configurations
- Refreshed test snapshots for new dependency versions
- Provided latest Node.js LTS with improved performance and security
@ypk ypk force-pushed the feat/IDAS-422-Node-22-Upgrade branch from 4ba22fa to 9ff153e Compare April 9, 2026 20:39
emil-placheta
emil-placheta approved these changes Apr 13, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@emil-placheta emil-placheta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ypk ypk added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 13, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit e14d976 Apr 13, 2026
22 checks passed
@ypk ypk deleted the feat/IDAS-422-Node-22-Upgrade branch April 13, 2026 08:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@emil-placheta emil-placheta emil-placheta approved these changes

@Snasim21 Snasim21 Snasim21 left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ypk @emil-placheta @Snasim21